Publications 04/06/2020

[COVID-19] Will companies that received state aid during the COVID-19 crisis be able to distribute dividends or repurchase their shares in 2020?

On 27 March 2020, the government announced that it wanted to reserve the various cash advances proposed as part of the COVID-19 crisis for companies that would not pay dividends and would not repurchase their shares in 2020.

Updated information, as of the date of publication of this article.

However, these equivocal announcements left some doubt as to the scope and concrete terms of implementation of this restriction.

Recent clarifications from the government, in the form of frequently asked questions, provide companies with information on the system regarding the prohibition of paying dividends and carrying out share repurchases during the COVID-19 crisis.

I. Which Companies Are Affected by the Prohibition to Pay Dividends / Carry Out Share Repurchases?

The companies concerned by the prohibition to pay dividends / carry out share repurchases are those companies which cumulatively fulfill the following conditions:

  1. They have received aid in the context of the COVID-19 crisis
    According to the document published by the government, only companies that have benefited from a deferment of tax and social security payments or a state-guaranteed loan are prohibited from paying dividends / repurchasing their shares in 2020.
    Therefore, companies that are not affected by the ban on dividend payments / share repurchase in the context of the COVID-19 crisis:

    • Would not have received any assistance;
    • Would have benefited only from aid other than the postponement of tax and social security payments or a state-guaranteed loan (e.g., partial unemployment).
  2. They exceed certain thresholds
    First of all, only large companies are concerned, i.e. those with a workforce of at least 5,000 employees or having a turnover in excess of EUR 1.5 billion in France in the last financial year for which the accounts have been closed.
    We would like to point out that this definition is understood in a very broad way, since companies belonging to a group which, on a consolidated basis, would exceed the above-mentioned thresholds, would all be subject to the prohibition to pay dividends / repurchase their shares, including those which would not have benefited from any State aid.
    The group of companies is defined here as all the companies that are fiscally integrated or that meet the conditions for being so, i.e. in practice companies that are at least 95% owned, directly or indirectly, by the same company.

  3. They have no legal obligation to pay dividends
    Companies that have a legal obligation to pay dividends are not affected by the prohibition.
    A mere statutory or contractual obligation to pay dividends should therefore not allow the company to circumvent this prohibition.
    A strict reading of the document published by the government leads us to believe that if a company has a legal obligation to pay dividends, then it could always, beyond such obligation, also repurchase its own shares without calling into question the State aid it has received.
    However, as regards companies that have a legal obligation to pay dividends, we would recommend not to repurchase their own shares in 2020, as this would be contrary to the spirit of the measure established by the government and would expose them to the sanctions described below.
    Be aware that for these companies, the amount distributed must be strictly limited to the amount required by their legal obligation.

II. Which Transactions Are Affected by the Ban?

The relevant companies are prohibited from carrying out the following transactions:

  • Paying dividends, in cash or shares;
  • Repurchasing their own shares;
  • And, more generally, performing all other forms of distribution in cash or shares (e.g., interim dividends, exceptional distributions of reserves, etc.).

We would like to point out that the ban only applies to the aforementioned transactions that would be carried out after 27 March 2020.
If the decision of the body competent to decide on such transactions is taken before 27 March 2020, then the relevant companies will be entitled to benefit from State cash aid (and/or keep the aid they have already received) without incurring the penalties stipulated in relation thereof.

On the other hand, share repurchase for the purpose of allocating shares to employees, as well as those intended to fulfil a legal commitment prior to 27 March 2020 (for example, in respect of a security giving access to the capital), are possible.
Share repurchase within the framework of an external growth operation is also authorized, provided that they are necessary and that this transaction was the subject of a legal commitment by the company prior to 27 March 2020. In the event of control, it will be incumbent upon the company to attest the reason why the share repurchases were carried out and evidence the actual allocation of the shares bought back for the claimed purposes.

As regards companies belonging to a group, intra-group distributions are also possible when they ultimately have the effect of financially supporting a French company.
This condition of financial support is rather vague and, should the relevant companies wish to make intra-group distributions, they will have to ensure that these distributions are made to French companies with real financial needs and that the intention to provide financial support to these companies is materialized in the various legal instruments drawn up at the time of the distribution.

Finally, the text published by the government also seems to authorize:

  • On the one hand, capital reductions, by repurchasing its own shares or by reducing their nominal amount, when they are motivated by losses;
  • On the other hand, redemptions of securities that are not made “for financial management purposes”.

The contours of this concept are uncertain, but it would appear that the text refers here to share buybacks that are neither intended to promote external growth or the liquidity of the securities nor intended for holders of securities giving access to the capital, except for the exceptions mentioned above.

We therefore believe, for example, that it should be possible for the relevant companies to carry out a share repurchase in 2020 for the sole purpose of internal restructuring without entailing any cash payments.

III. What Formalism Must Be Respected in Order to Be Eligible for State Aid?

The measure takes the form of a commitment made by the relevant company not to carry out the abovementioned transactions.

The formalism depends on the State aid concerned:

  • Concerning direct tax deferrals, the company must make a commitment by filling in the application form on the website of the French tax authorities impots.gouv.fr and ticking the dedicated box.
  • Concerning the deferral of social security contributions, the company must undertake, by a simple message (an e-mail may suffice) sent to Urssaf, which manages its account, to respect the commitment not to pay dividends and not to repurchase shares, which conditions the deferral of social security payments.
    The URSSAF will contact the companies concerned by e-mail before the 5 April deadline to inform them.
    In the case of groups, contact will be made with the group head company only: the commitment will then have to be sent by the group head company for the whole group, even if the postponement is requested by only one or some of the group’s legal entities.
  • As regards the granting of a State-guaranteed loan, a resolutory clause will be included in the loan contract when the loan application is examined by the Ministry of Economy and Finance.

IV. What Are the Penalties for Non-Commitment or Non-Compliance?

In the absence of a commitment or in the event of non-compliance with the aforementioned commitment, the social security contributions or tax instalments deferred or the loan guaranteed by the State will have to be repaid in addition to penalties for late payment under ordinary law.

These surcharges will be deducted from the normal due date of the extended maturities. Furthermore, companies will not be able to benefit from an agreement on a time limit for the extended due date and will have to pay all outstanding amounts immediately.

The team

Ilias
Dhaou

Associate

Lire la suite

Jean-François
Defudes

Partner

Lire la suite

Louise
Legrand

Associate

Lire la suite

Louise
Bras

Associate

Lire la suite

Gauthier
Pinabiaux

Associate

Lire la suite

Alexandra
Coeur

Associate

Lire la suite

Tessa
Serant

Associate

Lire la suite

Amandine
Racé

Associate

Lire la suite

Geoffroy
Tourin

Associate

Lire la suite

Lucas
Villain

Associate

Lire la suite

Mathilde
Mouret

Associate

Lire la suite

Julie
Mottier Mugnier

Associate

Lire la suite

Hanna
Gonod

Associate

Lire la suite

Lucie
Lavergne

Associate

Lire la suite

Emilie
De Ruyffelaere

Associate

Lire la suite

Pauline
Fournier Lesvenan

Associate

Lire la suite

Léa
Delorme

Associate

Lire la suite

Elisa
Messmer

Associate

Lire la suite

Marine
Ollagnon

Associate

Lire la suite

Guillaume
Douillard

Partner

Lire la suite

Paul
Camille

Associate

Lire la suite

Clémence
Desplancke

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Marie-Charlotte
Diriart

Partner

Lire la suite

Nadège
Ollier

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Mounira
Matouk

Associate

Lire la suite

Isabelle
Fokapu

Associate

Lire la suite

Thomas
Nogris

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Virginie
Brault-Scaillet

Partner

Lire la suite

Victoria
Stoop

Associate

Lire la suite

Matthieu
Bultel

Partner

Lire la suite

Charles-Eric
Thoor

Partner

Lire la suite

Tanguy
Nazaret

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Caroline
Cazaux

Partner

Lire la suite

Quentin
Keraval

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Edouard
De Limairac

Partner

Lire la suite

Delphine
Nowak

Partner

Lire la suite

Rachel
Devidal

Counsel

Lire la suite

Jérôme
Granotier

Partner

Lire la suite

Adrien
Morisse

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Mathieu
Bizet

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Lise-Aure
Jourdain

Counsel

Lire la suite

Philippe
Larivière

Partner

Lire la suite

Mathias
Clouye

Associate

Lire la suite

Dimitri
Nadelgaft

Senior associate

Lire la suite

François
Vibert

Counsel

Lire la suite

Jérémie
Boublil

Partner

Lire la suite

Elodie
Tournier

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Alice
Bauw

Paralegal

Lire la suite

Laurence
Moisy

Paralegal

Lire la suite

Jean-Marie
Tocchio

Partner

Lire la suite

Marie
Delmotte

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Martin
Wartelle

Associate

Lire la suite

Paul
Brisset

Partner

Lire la suite

Benjamin
Mourot

Partner

Lire la suite

Alain
Vamour

Partner

Lire la suite

Victor
Brouard

Associate

Lire la suite

Serge
Rastorgoueff

Partner

Lire la suite

Julien
Lecat

Partner

Lire la suite

Sébastien
Pinot

Partner

Lire la suite

Taous
Mabed

Partner

Lire la suite

Alexandre
Ghesquière

Partner

Lire la suite

Louis
Vallet

Partner

Lire la suite

Justine
Langer

Counsel

Lire la suite

Sophie
Frantzen-Bourez

Associate

Lire la suite

Delphine
Tagand

Counsel

Lire la suite

Neil
Robertson

Partner

Lire la suite

Nicolas
Moreau

Partner

Lire la suite

Axel
Gohaud

Associate

Lire la suite

Laetitia
Benoit

Partner

Lire la suite

Félicien
Hyest

Partner

Lire la suite

Barbara
Bertholet

Partner

Lire la suite

Ondine
Prévoteau

Partner

Lire la suite

Martin
Charron

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Tanguy
Dubly

Partner

Lire la suite

François
Vignalou

Partner

Lire la suite

Audrey
Bueche

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Pierre-Emmanuel
Scherrer

Partner

Lire la suite

Antoine
Arminjon

Partner

Lire la suite

Alban
Van de Vyver

Partner

Lire la suite

Antoine
Benoit

Partner

Lire la suite

Adèle
Durupt

Senior associate

Lire la suite

Louis
Bertrand

Associate

Lire la suite

Frédéric
Coulon

Partner

Lire la suite

Discover the news from: